| lower bound: | 100 |
| upper bound: | 101 |
Construction of a linear code [208,9,100] over GF(2):
[1]: [4, 1, 4] Cyclic Linear Code over GF(2)
RepetitionCode of length 4
[2]: [4, 3, 2] Cyclic Linear Code over GF(2)
Dual of the RepetitionCode of length 4
[3]: [8, 4, 4] "Reed-Muller Code (r = 1, m = 3)" Linear Code over GF(2)
PlotkinSum of [2] and [1]
[4]: [7, 3, 4] Linear Code over GF(2)
Shortening of [3] at 1
[5]: [64, 4, 55] Linear Code over GF(2^3)
BCHCode over GF(8) with parameters 63 54
[6]: [62, 4, 53] Linear Code over GF(2^3)
Puncturing of [5] at { 1, 2 }
[7]: [434, 12, 112] Linear Code over GF(2)
ConcatenatedCode of [6] and [4]
[8]: [210, 11, 100] Linear Code over GF(2)
generalized residue code of [7]
puncturing at the support of a word of weight 224
[9]: [208, 9, 100] Linear Code over GF(2)
Shortening of [8] at { 209 .. 210 }
last modified: 2001-01-30
Lb(208,9) = 100 is found by shortening of: Lb(210,11) = 100 EB1 Ub(208,9) = 101 follows by a one-step Griesmer bound from: Ub(106,8) = 50 follows by a one-step Griesmer bound from: Ub(55,7) = 25 vT4
vT4: H.C.A. van Tilborg, A proof of the nonexistence of a binary (55,7,26) code, TH-Report 79-WSK-09, Techn. Hogeschool Eindhoven, Nov. 1979.
Notes
|